![]() This time, we get to watch full dogfights that lead up to each climactic kaboom. ![]() The 1986 style of hard camera cuts to stitch together a shot-down bogey are done. Yet the crew also makes up for lost time since the first film was made by letting external cameras, including expertly staged drones, linger over death-defying flight sequences or use wide-angle shots to show how foolishly close its stunt flyers zip past each other. Top Gun: Maverick spends a lot of time in this perspective, so it's good to see the stunt teams and cinematographers repeatedly strike a hot beach volleyball high-five over this collaboration. But Top Gun's core tenets-incredible fighter-jet combat, enjoyable cheese, and the big-grin smile of Cruise-have returned in arguably finer form than the original. The Top Gun star of roughly 35 years ago ruled movie theaters for different reasons than the man he is today, yet this film never sees his character Maverick betray his beloved traits or feel like an old man faking like a 20-something hotshot.Ī few of the series' moving parts have been jettisoned so many years later, and lifetime fans of the film will definitely notice them. ![]() Perhaps most important of all, an aging-yet-excited Tom Cruise never steps beyond his pay grade. The character development hits important notes for both Pete "Maverick" Mitchell and the people in his high-speed orbit, and the film's focused supporting cast mostly hits the mark. ![]() The series' predilection for steering military theater toward Hollywood-style silliness is arguably more tolerable, as tempered by a savvy script and cutting-edge stunt work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |